Escape from Room 237

As a big fan of Stanley Kubrick, arguably the greatest director of all time, I was eagerly anticipating Room 237 and wanted to make sure I saw it on the big screen.  I was hugely disappointed.  The documentary is comprised of interviews with a small group of Kubrick-leaning cinephiles that pick apart tiny details in The Shining and use them to justify various theories about the movie and Kubrick’s hidden messages.  The most prevalent theme is that The Shining is really about the genocide of American native peoples and/or Holocaust victims.  Another theory presumably presented as fact is that the footage of the moon landing was faked, and faked by none other than Kubrick himself.  Supposedly there are all sorts of hidden jokes also present in The Shining, which are really easy to see once you start watching the movie at home frame-by-frame, a completely ridiculous supposition given that the movie came out in 1980 and was meant to be watched only in the theater.  DVD did not exist then, and neither did widespread consumer VCR use, nor VCRs that could clearly pause movie frames.

Room_237 poster smallI am not saying there is no validity to any of the theories posited, but I am saying these people are reading way too much into the minutiae of the movie.  And I’m also saying ‘so what?’  After having visited the fascinating LACMA Kubrick exhibit (still going a little while longer), I was hoping for more juicy insight into Kubrick and the movie-making process, more of the type of truly interesting discovery that I found in that exhibit.  None of that is to be found in Room 237.

What makes this movie even worse is that it is not even particularly interesting.  Consider the mastery of great documentary film: The Thin Blue Line, Roger & Me, Bowling for Columbine, Catfish, Searching for Sugar Man.  These films present their story in such a way as to develop character and plot in a way just as engrossing as good fictional drama.  Truth is often stranger than fiction, and these documentaries fully exploit that concept.  But not Room 237.  It’s just the delivery of one hackneyed, minimally qualified idea after another which do very little to offer any true insight into The Shining or the making thereof.

The highlight of Room 237 is at the very beginning of the film, where an interviewee speaks of the British movie posters for The Shining promoting “The wave of terror that swept across America.”  From there it goes into the Indian genocide theory, which I found cogent.  This bit at the beginning saves the movie from a lesser rating.  But Kubrick fans should do themselves a favor and watch one of his movies again; they’ll get more out of it than watching Room 237.  2/10


7 thoughts on “Escape from Room 237

  1. I watched this film yesterday, and I can only buy about 5 to 10 percent of it. The things like the Dopey Sticker is interesting and I buy that the crushed red VW bug as a little F-U to Stephen King. But the Indian thing, the moon landing, the nazis, they are all so far fetched and they also contrdict eachother, why make a documentary with 5 conflicting points that don’t add anything to eachothers commentary? I still enjoyed it though because I love the film so much… I always love to hear peoples interpretations of Kubrick.

  2. I stopped watching this movie maybe twenty minutes before the end. The breaking point came when they found some similarities when they played the movie backward and forward in the same scree. Talk about farfecthed. I could deal even with that if the movie went about it in a less dull way. Show some of the people who are talking at the least. Let us put a face to the looney!
    I agree with most of what you said but one thing. Kubrick intended to have his movies watched more than once. Way before 1980.
    In an interview right after making 2001, circa 1967, he said this: “The whole idea that a movie should be seen only once is an extension of our traditional conception of the film as an ephemeral
    entertainment rather than as a visual work of art. We don’t believe that we should hear a great piece of music only once, or see a great painting once, or even read a great book just once. But the film has until recent years been exempted from the category of art — a situation I’m glad is finally changing.”

    • I agree Kubrick films should be seen more than once, but certainly he never intended they be watched in slo-mo frame by frame.

  3. Thanks for your comments. To add on, I’m a fan of Kubrick movies, but also a fan of all good movies, and Room 237 just didn’t cut it. Kubrick fans might find some of the content interesting, but I’m sure most of the content in the film could already be found on the internet or elsewhere. I didn’t feel they had enough for a theatrically released feature on this one.

  4. Pingback: The Best and Worst of 2013 | movies remark

  5. Pingback: The Best and Worst of 2014 | movies remark

  6. Pingback: The Shining Meets New Yankee Workshop | movies remark

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s