Credit Apple TV marketing for finally pushing me to see the biggest movie of the year.
What I do is not up to you.
There are nice bits of Wonder Woman that absolutely soar. But…
* * *
Perhaps my biggest problem with superhero movies is they all end exactly the same. Wonder Woman is no different, which is too bad — because otherwise I found myself having a good time. I didn’t even mind the beginning non-titles (see posts on Les Miz, Selma, and the upcoming one for Logan Lucky.)
Two trailers included below. This movie is growing on me, but for now my original evaluation: 6/10
It’s pretty simple: if you like these kind of movies, you will like this one. If you are as bored with the latter-era comic-book superhero genre as I am, you won’t. It’s not that I don’t like superhero-action movies, but I am finding most of these movies to be re-treads of one another. And it doesn’t help when you know that no matter how bad things get, your hero and their core entourage will always survive.
Scarlett Johansson and Chris Evans
Nonetheless, I liked Captain America: The Winter Soldier — for about the first half. I found it dramatic enough, and entertaining, and I particularly liked the women in it: Scarlett Johansson, Cobie Smulders, and Emily VanCamp. But the second half degenerates into trite, formulaic action movie sequences. The whole secret organization-within-a-secret organization idea is tired, and why do big action films so often feel that they need to lay forth some supposedly high-minded moralistic message? Kenneth Turan of the L.A. Times:
For what is frustrating about this “Captain America” is that it’s saddled with the defects of its virtues. It’s a product of the highest quality, but at the end of the day that’s what it is: a machine-made, assembly-line product whose strengths tend to feel like items checked off a master list rather than being the result of any kind of individual creative touch. “Captain America” is everything a big budget superhero film should be — except inspired.
Thanks to The Loop; promotional site here.
I had mixed feelings about Watchmen (2009). At 162 mins., it’s draggy here and there and overall not the greatest success. But it has a number of good sequences and cool visuals, and I dig its vibe. Especially fun is the intro credit sequence. As far as the spate of comic-book movies goes, you could do a lot worse: Watchmen was better than last year’s The Avengers, and I think it captures more of the pure essence of the Batman comic books than the recent, overrated Christian Bale triptych itself does.
Time’s Richard Corliss wrote:
Both admirable for and cramped by its fidelity to the Moore vision, this ambitious picture is a thing of bits and pieces. Yes, the bits are glorious, the pieces magnificent. Still, this Watchmen is more like a swatch-man.
It’s been too long for me to provide a numerical rating, but I give Watchmen a qualified recommendation: watch the preview first. If it appeals to you and you like the genre, go for it and settle in for a long one.