It often feels like a throwback to both classic ’80s Spielberg flicks and anthology shows like Amazing Stories, and to classic slasher-hackers. The cinematography and direction are refreshingly old-school. And while the occasionally scattershot film lacks cohesion, it makes amends with moments of lyric mirth and an intimacy among its characters normally lacking in such endeavors.
It, a.k.a. Stranger Thingswith a Clown, delivers a twinge of fear right at the beginning, with the clown in the gutter. That moment when we don’t know what will happen is very effective — until something does happen. And once it does, It traverses from scary to silly and never quite comes back. Or maybe put another way, from adult-scary to kid-scary. Once that edge is removed, It was not ably to frighten me as much as it tried.
Then in the latter part of the film, the worst thing imaginable happens: It becomes draggy. Nonetheless, on the strength of its assets, It rises to a marginal 7/10.
Comparison Notes (recommended & essential): Stand by Me, E.T., The Ring
“Scary” movies rarely do it for me, but Ouija: Origin of Evil looked promising. It features an appealing sixties setting, a reasonably compelling story for the genre, and a couple ‘boo’ moments that actually work. A marginal recommendation with the standard caveats. 6/10
I don’t know what I was thinking. This type of movie just isn’t for me. I find it mind-bogglingly boring. I suppose if you’ve never seen a scary movie before it could work.
Lights Out makes The Visit look like a horror classic. 2/10
* * *
On a related note: Why is it that zombies or ghosts are always at least 10 times stronger in zombie / ghost form than they ever were while living? Can anyone answer me that?
I think there’s a good movie out there — maybe I’ll have to write it — with ghosts behaving like ghosts. Passing through walls, haunting people’s dreams, that kind of thing. Something that could be truly frightening.
I figured somewhere on Rotten Tomatoes that I’d find a capsule I could swallow, but no such luck.
So, here’s mine: a terrific and unexpected first half, a let-down in the second half, and lots of great thematic elements and rich gothic atmosphere that’s never fully exploited. Crimson Peak deserved a story with ever-more eventful intrigue, but it falls way short — as if the writers became further and further bogged down in their own thick red mire. Still, there’s some enjoyment to be had, so a marginal recommendation. 6/10
This is the kind of Halloween movie I can get into. I saw the trailer a couple months back, so was expecting it by the fall, but it’s not to be — we’ll have to wait until the end of February. Perhaps because of the crowded field of horror films this fall.
It’s from A24, which is a good sign.
OH — and speaking of Halloween — the original Halloween (1978) is finally available via iTunes rental. I’ve never seen it, so expect a report forth-with. I saw a chunk on TV and became quite fascinated.
I kept wanting to watch Sinister when it was in theaters last year, because I like a good horror flick and I’m a fan of Ethan Hawke, but mixed ratings kept me away. Now I understand the negative reviews. It is your basic haunted house movie, but not a good one. It’s highly unoriginal, not scary at all — except for the first scene, and at times farcically corny. And it has a lot of “stupid” problems like the main character (Hawke) screaming his head off — multiple times — without waking any family members.
What I don’t get is that a lot of people thought this was a good movie. A lot of people who supposedly are fans of the genre, which means they’ve seen good fantasy/horror/haunted spirit movies, can’t tell the difference. Maybe the problem is that though there are a few standouts like The Ring, The Shining, and Poltergeist, the vast majority of these movies are pretty bad. So make yourself a fan of the genre and it all blends together. Just a theory.
For a much better haunted house movie, see Paranormal Activity (2007) if you haven’t already. Or even if you have – Paranormal Activity a second time through is better than Sinister the first. I looked back at my comments on Paranormal Activity — I had given it a 7/10. Thinking more about it now, I’d say it was more scary than a 7 — so I’m bumping it to an 8. Keep in mind I am talking about the original of the series; I have not seen any of the sequels.
On a positive note, I watched Sinister shortly before going to bed, and it certainly did not keep me from sleeping. It just wasn’t scary. 2/10, which is generous.
* * *
This movie makes me rethink my opinion of Mama (2/10), because I didn’t dislike Sinister quite so much as to give it a 1 rating, and Mama was clearly better than Sinister. I think Mama has got to be at least a 3 — still not recommended, but better than I originally thought given the genre. It emphasizes how difficult it is to make good horror, especially of the supernatural variety. Almost as difficult as good comedy.
The last post focused on some excellent personal thrillers that stay in the ‘real world’. Now for some movies that cross over into the super-natural.
First, a reminder of previous posts that highlighted films in this category, most notably The Ring. And a comment on these type of movies: The Ring is probably the best, scariest haunted spirit movie I have ever seen. This is a genre I’m not necessarily a fan of. I have seen so many previews where — at the end of the trailer — someone stares into a void and then, suddenly, out comes some sort of screaming banshee – a big ‘BOO’ moment. Those ‘BOO’ moments can get tiresome, if for example it’s The Grudge and that’s all the movie can muster.
Screeching humanoid forms suddenly twisting and screaming out of the darkness: One of the most scary things can be someone walking through a house where a tension exists — the tension of some evil bad guy about to pop out and catch the protagonist by surprise, no matter how prepared he may be. This has got to be about the most Continue reading →