Four Directors and A Funeral

…for them, and many more, en masse. Another good article in the Times. I’m wanting to see some of these movies.

Wiping out great art just because the artist did some bad stuff is tragedy.  I’m sure we wouldn’t agree with everything the Egyptians did, let’s bulldoze the pyramids. And the history of this country? Maybe give it all back.

Now they’re talking about taking down all the Gauguin paintings. Any museums who don’t want it can give them to me.

Film Brief: Wonder Wheel

Wonder Wheel has some nice attributes, but probably skip it unless you’re a die-hard Woody Allen fan.  The rhythm and cadence familiar to WA moviewatchers is there, but the story is not particularly original or deep.  The “Mapping” I wrote of earlier is definitely employed again here.

I blame Amazon Studios for the the shortcomings of this film, not WA.  Marginal thumbs-down with the standard caveats.  5/10

Café Society: A Modern Shakespearean Rom-Com

Cafe Society - poster

I had a number of observations watching Café Society, a few of which apply to a wide swath of the latter-era Woody Allen oeuvre:

1)  Mapping as a Woody Allen thought experiment.  You can think of any WA movie as any other WA movie mapped onto a [fill in the blank] setting.  That is to say, it’s as if WA is thinking, “I want to make a movie with this setting, and that thematic element, how do I do it?  Is this new movie going to be with cyborgs?  CIA spies?  No.  This is going to be a Woody Allen picture, just set differently.”

As with Irrational Man, in the early going especially it can seem contrived.   But then — quickly — it all begins to gel.  I look forward to WA’s annual offering because of that special feeling you get with his films, but more broadly, it doesn’t matter if his latest film seems like a bit of a re-tread, a mapping of some other of his movies onto this year’s dinner table.  With a WA film, you’re automatically guaranteed to be transported to a whole different ballpark, one that so many lesser filmmakers can only dream of entering.  And that’s why he always attracts the biggest A-list stars.

2) Café Society, and so many of his films, are modern Shakespeare comedy.  Were Shakespeare around today, I don’t think he would find a WA picture alien in the least.  To my admittedly limited knowledge, Shakespeare did not engage in plots any more complicated than those of Woody Allen.  And it’s a delight when things are kept just complicated enough.  There’s no beating around the bush in Shakespeare, nor WA.

3) Jesse Eisenberg’s role seems like WA was writing a more confident version of himself.  Eisenberg has got the WA mannerisms and way of speaking down pat.

4) I guessed that Harvey Keitel was the narrator — boy was I wrong.  It’s Woody Allen himself!  His voice was much deeper than I usually think of it.

I am often annoyed by narration in film, as with WA’s Vicky Christina Barcelona.  But it works here.

5) There may be glitches here and there in WA’s mapping.  For instance, “Thanks for the heads up” I believe to be an anachronism.  Also, WA’s Jewish jokes seem a little out of place to me, which luckily doesn’t make them any less funny or effective.  Just classic WA humor, no matter where it’s mapped.

6) Amazon Studios.  An idea was posited that if Apple really wants to get serious about content creation, she should buy Netflix.  I’m not sure about that idea, nor about the idea of Apple creating content.  The Pixar lineage is there, though.  Any case, I have mixed feelings.  I suppose content creation is important, so if it makes sense, then as a stockholder I say go for it.

7) It all works.  In the end, Woody Allen is quite brilliant, and that shines through even his lesser offerings.  Café Society is fun and engaging, despite any glitches.  7/10

The Great Expectations of an Irrational Man

Irrational Man - poster med

Sometimes critics just don’t get fun films.  With a lame title — that I’ve now warmed to, equally lame poster art, and a Tomatometer score of 39%, I was expecting to be bored or annoyed with Irrational Man.  But Joaquin Phoenix intrigues me, and so does Woody Allen, and Emma Stone doesn’t hurt the cause — so I decided to give it a shot.

The Rotten Tomatoes consensus could not be more wrong:

Irrational Man may prove rewarding for the most ardent Joaquin Phoenix fans or Woody Allen apologists, but all others most likely need not apply

Malarkey!  Irrational Man is not Woody Allen’s best effort, but this is a delightful, fun film.  A little clunkiness hampers the early going, and throughout there is a light air of contrivance that encumbers even his better films of late, such as Blue Jasmine.  That didn’t prevent Blue Jasmine from being one of the best films of 2013; Irrational Man is not up to Blue Jasmine’s level, but it is still quite entertaining, and Woody Allen deserves credit for making a very different movie here.  He may not knock it out of the park every time, but his pictures prove fresh and inventive from one to the next.  7/10  Irrational Man - text block

Cinematic Greats: Hannah and Her Sisters

Hannah and Her Sisters - poster large

Woody Allen at his best means movies at their best.  It’s been since the 80’s that I’ve seen Hannah and Her Sisters, but I remember generally liking it, and every time it pops up on the tele I love watching a few moments.  I realize that’s not a ringing endorsement, but I wouldn’t laud it as a Cinematic Great if I weren’t strongly recommending it.  Roger Ebert gave the movie 4 of 4 stars, calling it “the best movie [Woody Allen] has ever made.”  He goes on to say:

The movie is not a comedy, but it contains big laughs, and it is not a tragedy, although it could be if we thought about it long enough.


Allen’s writing and directing style is so strong and assured in this film that the actual filmmaking itself becomes a narrative voice, just as we sense Henry James behind all of his novels, or William Faulkner or Iris Murdoch behind theirs.

Ebert’s partner Siskel:

“Hannah and Her Sisters” is a joy to behold, a complex film that never loses either its sense of purpose or sense of humor.

Siskel & Ebert loved this movie, and so will you.  It may well be the ultimate Woody Allen picture.  For now, unfortunately, not available via VOD, so try to find a DVD, or catch on TCM or another movie channel.  It’s sad that such great classics get shoved to oblivion purely because they were released in the pre-digital age.

Upcoming Movies: Jarmusch, Woody Allen, Under the Skin

THE LOCAL ARTHOUSE showed some trailers of note last night before the feature Nymphomaniac Vol. I (last post).  First off is a new Jim Jarmusch film, Only Lovers Left Alive — his take on the vampire genre — which is interesting in that he’s taking a genre at all.  I’m not sure we need another vampire film, but I am a BIG fan of Jim Jarmusch — so I’m excited to see it upon release in my area (click for site & trailer):

Only Lovers Left Behind

Only Lovers Left Alive

Next, John Turturro wrote and directed Fading Gigolo, which, surprise surprise, features Woody Allen acting in a film that, watching the preview, I assumed was a Woody Allen film — it had that comic flavor.  VERY unusual to see Woody Allen acting — or indeed involved at all — in a film he did not make.  It looks a little silly and simple, but it could be fun.

Fading Gigolo - trailer

Fading Gigolo

And then there’s the ever-inceasingly-ballyhooed Under The Skin starring Scarlett Johansson — this indie is making such a splash that the local, very mainstream, very commercial classic rock station’s DJ just mentioned it.  As you can see at its site, it has received a lot of advance critical praise.

Here’s hoping all three of these indies offer big entertainment value.

Under the Skin

Under the Skin

Woody Allen Retrospective — Slideshow

Match Point stillWatching this slideshow makes me realize how few Woody Zelig stillAllen films I’ve seen.  He’s certainly a mixed bag, with, for example, Vicky Cristina Barcelona — equally as lame as its title — on the low end, and on the high end wonderful, quintessential Allen pieces like Manhattan.  And between those poles there’s a lot of marginal, fair, or serviceable material such as Midnight in Paris and Celebrity.

Nonetheless, I’m keen to view his more acclaimed work, and for a long time I’ve wanted to watch his musical Everyone Says I Love You.  I’ll have to keep waiting on that one, as it is not available for rental through any of the standard sources.

Thumb’s Up for Blue Jasmine

Blue Jasmine posterBlue Jasmine is about a woman in crisis, or more specifically, a woman at the precipice.  Jasmine (Cate Blanchett) is used to a life of wealth and privilege, and is suddenly confronted with losing everything.  She is not an entirely sympathetic character, and there are a couple clunky aspects to the storytelling, but I found Blue Jasmine to be an interesting and compelling dramatic turn for Woody Allen.  The riches-to-rags story may be thought of as a modern take on Sense and Sensibility or Howard’s End, as well as a commentary on the way a change in material comfort can knock a fragile personality out of balance.  Or put more simply, it’s like watching a fish squirm about after being dragged on deck of a boat.

Blue Jasmine - still 1

Sally Hawkins and Andrew Dice Clay

I liked Cate Blanchett in this, but a surprising strong point of the film were its supporting performances — notably that of Sally Hawkins as her sister Ginger, and Ginger’s ex-husband Andrew Dice Clay.  After watching the preview some months ago [prior post], I was not expecting to like this film much.  But Blue Jasmine succeeds.  It struck me on an emotional level in a way quite removed from Allen’s common tongue-in-cheek or lighthearted tone as recently exemplified in the marginal Midnight in Paris.

Blue Jasmine is certain to garner one of the couple-dozen Best Picture Oscar nominations, and Blanchett for acting.  David Denby of The New Yorker wrote:

The actress, like her character, is out on a limb much of the time, but there’s humor in Blanchett’s work, and a touch of self-mockery as well as an eloquent sadness. When she drops her voice to its smoky lower register, we know that she’s teasing the tragic mode. That edge of self-parody keeps us close to her, and we need that closeness, because we’re in for a rough ride.

Hawkins too deserves recognition by the Academy with a supporting nomination.  8/10

Movies with Penélope Cruz

email 4 Sep 2008

I first saw Penélope Cruz in Blow (2001), the drug film starring Johnny Depp.  Here’s a new rule: if it’s got Johnny Depp, see it.  I don’t know that he’s made a bad film.  Blow is very good if you want something with that subject matter, and Penélope Cruz emerges as a revelation in the film with her incredible beauty.

Then there was the whole Cruz – Cruise thing in the tabloid media when Tom Cruise was briefly enamored with her – from co-stints in Vanilla Sky, which I didn’t care a whole lot for when I saw it, but there is something about it that haunts me, from when I caught a bit on TV recently.  So might be worth another look.  Tom Cruise gets a disfigured face in this one, which morbidly interests me. Continue reading